Clear leader
14 companies value 14 bn revenue 12 bn margin 4.9% free cash flow 0.9 bn avg. score 2.1
DAR holds 68.5% of the group's value, 7.0x the runner-up
| Rank | Ticker | Company | Share | Value | Revenue | Margin | FCF | 5 years | FCF/px | Yield | What it does · why it is here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DAR | Darling Ingredients United States · score 6.5 | 69% | 9.4 bn | 6.5 bn | 9.1% | 1.0 bn | 10.3% | — | Recycling animal by-products into ingredients and biodiesel · Global leader in animal fat rendering and renewable diesel (Diamond Green) | |
| 2 | REX | REX American Resources United States · score 5.7 | 10% | 1.3 bn | 0.7 bn | 12.6% | 0.1 bn | 5.1% | — | Ethanol production and carbon capture · Ethanol production with a debt-free balance sheet | |
| 3 | GPRE | Green Plains United States · score 5.7 | 7% | 1.0 bn | 1.8 bn | 6.8% | 0.1 bn | 12.8% | 0.2% | Ethanol, protein and corn ingredients · One of the largest US ethanol producers | |
| 4 | ALTO | Alto Ingredients, Inc. United States · score 6.4 | 2% | 0.3 bn | 0.9 bn | 5.5% | 0.1 bn | 18.4% | — | Specialty alcohols, renewable fuels and ingredients · California — revenue of $943m | |
| 5 | CLNE | Clean Energy Fuels Corp. United States · score 2.1 | 2% | 0.3 bn | 0.4 bn | -21.3% | 0.0 bn | 7.4% | — | Renewable and compressed natural gas for transportation · California — revenue of $442m | |
| 6 | OPAL | OPAL Fuels Inc. United States · score 0.1 | 2% | 0.3 bn | 0.3 bn | 5.2% | -0.1 bn | -18.8% | 0.0% | Biogas capture and conversion into renewable natural gas · Massachusetts — revenue of $340m | |
| 7 | MNTK | Montauk Renewables, Inc. United States · score 0.6 | 2% | 0.3 bn | 0.2 bn | 4.2% | -0.1 bn | -28.2% | — | Landfill biogas converted to renewable natural gas · Pennsylvania — revenue of $189m | |
| 8 | GEVO | Gevo, Inc. United States · score 0.0 | 2% | 0.3 bn | 0.2 bn | -119.9% | -0.1 bn | -20.3% | — | Sustainable aviation fuel and renewable chemicals, since 2005 · Colorado — revenue of $178m | |
| 9 | FF | FutureFuel Corp. United States · score 0.9 | 2% | 0.2 bn | 0.1 bn | -17.2% | -0.1 bn | -20.8% | 3.4% | Chemicals and biodiesel · Arkansas — revenue of $153m | |
| 10 | AMTX | AEMETIS, INC United States · score 0.0 | 1% | 0.1 bn | 0.2 bn | -27.4% | -0.0 bn | -39.8% | — | Low-carbon renewable fuels from agricultural waste · California — revenue of $220m | |
| 11 | LNZA | LanzaTech Global, Inc. United States · score 1.8 | 1% | 0.1 bn | 0.1 bn | 295.7% | -0.0 bn | -52.7% | — | Converting waste carbon into ethanol and chemicals · Illinois — revenue of $58m | |
| 12 | SAFX | XCF Global, Inc. United States · score 0.0 | 1% | 0.1 bn | 0.0 bn | -397.6% | -0.0 bn | -31.0% | — | Sustainable aviation fuel and biofuels · Texas — revenue of $15m | |
| 13 | AGIG | ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. United States · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.0 bn | 0.0 bn | -11x | -0.0 bn | -42.2% | — | Converting waste into hydrocarbons · Texas — revenue of $3m | |
| 14 | VGAS | Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. United States · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.0 bn | — | — | -0.0 bn | -28.3% | — | Gas-to-liquid fuel conversion technology · Texas |
Other industries in the same sector
- Sector overview
- Integrated oil 5 companies
- Exploration and production (E&P) 51 companies
- Midstream and pipelines 18 companies
- National and state oil companies 5 companies
- Refining and marketing 10 companies
- Canadian oil producers 8 companies
- Oilfield services and equipment 27 companies
- Midstream MLPs (partnerships) 10 companies
- LNG and gas exports 11 companies
- Natural gas (E&P) 11 companies
- Oil and land royalties 9 companies
- Uranium and nuclear fuel 17 companies
and 5 industries more
- Subsea and offshore equipment 3 companies
- Offshore drilling 5 companies
- Coal 11 companies
- Fracking and pressure pumping services 13 companies
- Fuel distribution 14 companies
What this is. A catalogue, not a guide. Every industry with stocks listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ, the companies contending for its leadership, what each one does according to its own annual report, and the balance sheet it filed with the SEC.
The score runs from 0 to 10 and compares each company with every other one in the almanac on cash generation, profitability, debt, dividends and consistency over the last five years. The higher it is, the better the company fares in that comparison. Curious how much each part weighs? Ask at the bottom of the page.
The score runs from 0 to 10 and compares each company with every other one in the almanac on cash generation, profitability, debt, dividends and consistency over the last five years. The higher it is, the better the company fares in that comparison. Curious how much each part weighs? Ask at the bottom of the page.